This is the second blog from a four-part series.

#1 Environmental factors

The way a person experiences a relationship entirely depends on the environment he or she exists in. To understand it in detail, let’s do a deep dive into the history of romantic relationships in the West, since we have some data from Western Europe.

A romantic relationship (among masses) has never been a permanent reality across the entire timeline of history. Let’s take your grandparents: Depending on the country, region, or social strata, they probably lived in a very different environment than what you and your partner currently do. Romance occupied less relevance back then and meant something entirely different.

Imagine that you are living in a hunter-gatherer group of 50–150 people, 10,000 years ago. You are constantly on the move for sustenance, surrounded by predators, bugs, and diseases. Do you really think romance would be top of mind for you and your partner? Survival is what you live for, and you live to survive. The primary reason for being together with the opposite sex would have been for procreation so that the clan survives and genes are passed on.

Historically, stories of romantic associations are pretty rare, a luxury only limited to emperors, kings and the courtesans — that too within boundaries. In Western Europe, a casual relationship was frowned upon and churches came down heavily on premarital sex. Adultery (even for kings at times) was not allowed, and divorce was very hard to get, especially under the popedom. Among the wealthy, a marriage was often a matter of increasing family wealth and power (see reference).

Medieval Europe suffered from extreme conditions, extreme damp cold weather, diseases, sanitation challenges, and poor health. Women and their babies often died during childbirth, and young children from illnesses. Sadness and tragedy were part of life, especially for women (see reference). The Bubonic Plague killed almost a third of Europe’s population. The idea of a relationship would have been very limited back then, without much room for romance.

Before the Industrial Revolution, the role of a Western woman was limited to that of a caretaker and was mostly household-bound. Forget romance — many were forced into marriages, sometimes violently. Arranged marriage was common; consent was pretty uncommon (see reference).

But industrialization brought work opportunities. Therefore, the possibility of being independent and self-reliant. However, women were discriminated against men, and the pay was barely enough for subsistence. Women workers were exploited, even sexually (see reference).

In fact, most factory workers were abused, some working up to 80–100 hours every week (see reference). Only a few who owned businesses benefited from the industrial revolution, as they became the new middle- and upper-middle class.

Do you really think that they had the luxury to fantasize about love and romance? The status of the masses was anything but romantic. A relationship was for practical purposes. The concept of romantic love became common only when the masses also started to enjoy the fruits of the Industrial Revolution. The era in which poets and artists started contributing significantly to romance coincided with major societal transformations as a result of Industrial Revolution (see reference).

Thank you for reading, I hope you will enjoy reading the Part 3 and 4 as well.

One response to “Why relationships don’t work anymore: 3 reasons – Part 2”

  1. […] Environmental factors […]

Leave a Reply

Recent posts

Quote of the week

"People ask me what I do in the winter when there's no baseball. I'll tell you what I do. I stare out the window and wait for spring."

~ Rogers Hornsby

@ Copyright Arunthinks 2025

Discover more from Arun thinks

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading